Discover why tin-based SAC (Sn-Ag-Cu) solders replaced lead: stronger, safer, and essential for modern electronics.
Soldering is one of those hidden technologies that makes modern electronics possible. At its core, soldering is the art of joining metals together using a filler material—called solder—that melts at a lower temperature than the components it connects. Unlike welding, where the base materials themselves are melted and fused, soldering works by isolating the heat to the solder alone. Once molten, the soldering material flows into microscopic gaps between surfaces, then solidifies into a joint that is at once electrical, mechanical, and reliable.
If you have ever wondered how the tiny components inside smartphones, laptops, or automotive control modules remain firmly in place while carrying power and data, the answer is almost always solder. Think of it as the metallic glue of the electronics world, only this glue must be conductive, durable, and engineered to withstand years of thermal and mechanical stress.
The Shift from Lead to Lead-Free Solders in Electronics Manufacturing
For decades, the solder of choice in electronics manufacturing was the tin–lead eutectic alloy (Sn–Pb). With its low melting point of 183 °C, excellent wettability, and high tolerance to mechanical stress, Sn–Pb set the standard for reliable soldering. It was easy to process, consistently delivered strong performance in PCB assembly, and adaptable across applications. In addition to soldering, high-lead alloys were widely used as die attach in high-temperature semiconductor packaging because of their ductility and stress-absorbing properties.
But the very element that made these alloys so useful—lead—also made them problematic. Lead is toxic to humans and harmful to the environment. As electronic devices proliferated in the late 20th century, so did concerns about the cumulative impact of lead contamination in landfills and recycling streams. By the early 2000s, regulations such as the EU Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive made it clear: the electronics industry had to eliminate lead.
This global shift sparked an urgent search for alternatives. The challenge was daunting: replacing an alloy system that had proven itself for decades, without compromising on performance or manufacturability. Out of the many candidates, one family of alloys emerged as the most successful: tin–silver–copper (Sn–Ag–Cu), or SAC solders.
Why Tin Is the Base Metal in Lead-Free Solder Alloys
To understand why SAC solders took the lead, we must first look at the role of tin. An effective solder material must meet several demanding requirements. Solders should melt at a temperature low enough to avoid damaging sensitive components, yet high enough to remain stable in service. They must wet common metallizations like copper to ensure strong joints. It should provide sufficient mechanical strength and fatigue resistance to survive temperature swings and vibrations. And it should have good electrical and thermal conductivity to ensure reliable performance in circuits.
Tin, as it turns out, satisfies all of these criteria. With a melting point of 232 °C, it offers a manageable processing temperature that is not far from that of the traditional Sn–Pb eutectic (183°C). Its electrical resistivity is significantly lower than lead’s, and its thermal conductivity is higher—both critical in today’s high-current, high-density electronics. Tin also wets copper effectively, creating strong metallurgical bonds. Just as importantly, tin was already a major constituent of Sn–Pb solders, meaning the industry’s infrastructure was well adapted to working with it.
What makes tin even more interesting is its unique crystal structure. At room temperature, tin stabilizes in the β-tin phase, which crystallizes in a body-centered tetragonal (BCT) structure. This is unusual, as most metals adopt cubic structures. The BCT arrangement makes tin anisotropic, meaning its properties vary with direction.
Anisotropic Properties of Tin as a Solder Joint
- Coefficient of Thermal Expansion: Depending on the crystallographic direction, tin’s CTE can differ by nearly a factor of two. On certain planes, the CTE is close to that of copper and circuit boards, helping solder joints accommodate thermal stresses more effectively.
- Elastic Modulus: Tin’s stiffness varies by up to five times depending on orientation, and it changes significantly with temperature. This allows tin-based solder joins to better flex, relieve stress, and avoid brittle failure during thermal cycling.
The anisotropic nature of tin is perhaps most evident in its elastic modulus. From the graph in Figure 2, above, at 50 °C, for example, the stiffness measured along the <100> direction is about 20 GPa, while along the <001> direction it reaches nearly 65 GPa—a striking difference of more than threefold depending solely on crystal orientation. This is not a one-off effect tied to a specific temperature; rather, the same orientation-dependent behavior is observed across the full range of service conditions that solder joints experience. As temperature changes, tin’s modulus shifts as well, but its anisotropic character remains. This combination of temperature sensitivity and directional flexibility means that tin-based solder joints can bend and redistribute stresses instead of fracturing like a brittle material. In practice, this anisotropy helps solder joints endure repeated heating and cooling cycles, protecting electronic assemblies from premature mechanical failure.
The Challenge of Anisotropy
Anisotropy, however, is a double-edged sword. Because tin has a relatively high entropy of melting, it doesn’t solidify right at its melting point. Instead, it usually needs to cool an extra 20–50 °C before solidification begins in the solder joints. Once it finally starts to solidify, the grains grow very quickly. This often leads to joints made up of only one or a few crystal orientations, forming the familiar “beach-ball” microstructures dominated by large grains.
Such coarse, oriented structures make solder joints highly dependent on crystallographic orientation. This can affect creep behavior under sustained loads, thermal fatigue resistance during cycling, and vulnerability to electromigration under high current densities. Compared to the fine-grained, isotropic microstructure of Sn-Pb solders, tin’s solidification behavior introduces new reliability challenges.
Pure tin has another weakness: it can undergo tin pest, a kind of transformation where the stable form of tin (β-tin) changes into a brittle form (α-tin) at temperatures below 13.2 °C. This phase change causes about a 28% volume increase, which can eventually break the metal apart and even reduce it to powder over time. Clearly, tin needed help to become a reliable foundation for soldering. That help came in the form of alloying.
Alloying: Transforming Tin into SAC Solders
The addition of small amounts of alloying elements dramatically improves the performance of tin as a solder. Even concentrations as low as 1000 ppm can stabilize β-tin and prevent the destructive tin pest transformation. Beyond this, alloying addresses the challenges of anisotropy and undercooling by refining the solidification microstructure and introducing strengthening intermetallic phases.
The two most important alloying elements are silver (Ag) and copper (Cu).
- Silver forms Ag₃Sn particles within the solder matrix. These particles refine the microstructure and significantly enhance thermal fatigue resistance. By dispersing stress and impeding crack propagation, silver strengthens solder joints and extends their service life. The graph below (Figure 4) shows how the addition of silver from 1% (SAC105) to 3% (SAC305) increases the overall strength of the solder joint. However, too much silver can make joints more brittle, especially under mechanical shock.
- Copper forms Cu₆Sn₅ intermetallics, particularly at interfaces with copper pads. These intermetallics enhance toughness and bonding stability, but must be carefully controlled to prevent excessive growth that could embrittle the joints. Typical Cu contents range from 0.5 to 0.7%, striking a balance between reliability and manufacturability.
Together, Ag and Cu transform tin from a material with unpredictable microstructures into one that solidifies more uniformly, with refined grains and stable intermetallics. The result is a family of alloys that balances between strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance across a wide range of applications.
Common SAC Compositions
Different applications demand different tradeoffs between strength, toughness, and cost. This has led to a variety of SAC compositions, each optimized for particular needs.
| Alloy | Composition (wt%) | Key Mechanical Properties | Cost/Performance Balance | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINQALLOY SAC305 | Sn 96.5, Ag 3.0, Cu 0.5 | Balanced strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance; reliable under general thermal cycling | Industry standard; good all-around performance at moderate cost | Smartphones, laptops, consumer electronics |
| LINQALLOY SAC105 | Sn 98.5, Ag 1.0, Cu 0.5 | Lower strength than SAC305 but higher ductility; excellent drop-shock resistance | Lowest cost due to minimal silver; optimized for mechanical shock | Automotive electronics, sensors, control modules |
| LINQALLOY SAC405 | Sn 95.5, Ag 4.0, Cu 0.5 | Highest strength and creep resistance; strong but less ductile | Higher cost due to silver content; best for harsh environments | Aerospace, defense, industrial equipment |
| LINQALLOY SAC396 | Sn 96.0, Ag 3.9, Cu 0.6 | Excellent thermal fatigue resistance; stronger intermetallic bonding; robust under cyclic stress | Higher cost, specialized alloy; optimized for thermal cycling | Servers, data centers, telecom infrastructure |
| LINQALLOY SAC387 | Sn 95.5, Ag 3.8, Cu 0.7 | Near-eutectic behavior → sharp melting; excellent joint reliability, great thermal fatigue resistance, good wetting and flow properties | More expensive due to higher silver content; chosen for high-reliability needs | BGA/CSP solder spheres, wave soldering; high-reliability electronics assembly |
These alloys illustrate the versatility of the SAC system. SAC305 has become the industry standard for consumer electronics thanks to its balanced performance and reasonable cost. SAC105, with its lower silver content, sacrifices some strength for improved ductility and drop-shock resistance—an advantage in automotive applications. SAC405, with higher silver, maximizes strength and creep resistance, making it suitable for aerospace and defense. Specialized compositions like SAC396 and SAC387 are tailored for heavy thermal cycling or high-reliability assembly, ensuring joints perform even under the harshest conditions.
Smarter Electronic Connections with CAPLINQ
Through careful alloying with silver, copper, and microalloying elements, engineers have transformed tin’s anisotropy into solder systems that are robust, reliable, and adaptable. This is why SAC solders have become the global standard for lead-free electronics—delivering the right balance of strength, thermal fatigue resistance, and processability across consumer, automotive, industrial, and aerospace applications. Still, there remain niche cases where the use of lead cannot yet be fully eliminated—most notably to suppress tin whisker growth in mission-critical systems such as satellites, avionics, and medical devices. These exemptions highlight the tradeoffs engineers face in balancing reliability with environmental regulations.
At CAPLINQ, we build on this foundation with our LINQALLOY® range of solder spheres, paste, wire, and preforms in all major SAC compositions. To further enhance reliability, our portfolio also includes molding compounds, underfills, coatings, and adhesives that protect and reinforce assemblies against thermal, mechanical, and environmental stresses—enabling performance that lasts even in the harshest conditions.
Ready to take your assemblies to the next level? Explore our full lead-free solder portfolio here
and partner with CAPLINQ to build connections that last.
![Illustration of the tetragonal crystal structure of tin, showing gray spheres as atoms connected in a lattice. Crystallographic directions are marked with arrows: [001] in red (vertical axis), [100] in green (horizontal axis), [110] in blue (diagonal), and [111] in pink (angled).](https://i0.wp.com/blog.caplinq.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/221-1.png?resize=1170%2C439&ssl=1)


